XXX 36.9. Portability Issues¶
It is easier to port a shell than a shell script.
–Larry Wall
This book deals specifically with Bash scripting on a GNU/Linux system. All the same, users of sh and ksh will find much of value here.
As it happens, many of the various shells and scripting languages seem
to be converging toward the POSIX 1003.2 standard. Invoking Bash with the `` –posix `` option or inserting a set -o posix at the head of a script causes Bash to conform very closely to this standard. Another alternative is to use a #!/bin/sh sha-bang header in the script, rather than #!/bin/bash . ` [1]
<portabilityissues.html#FTN.AEN20799>`__ Note that
`` /bin/sh `` is a link to `` /bin/bash `` in Linux and certain other flavors of UNIX, and a script invoked this way disables extended Bash functionality.
Most Bash scripts will run as-is under ksh , and vice-versa, since Chet Ramey has been busily porting ksh features to the latest versions of Bash.
On a commercial UNIX machine, scripts using GNU-specific features of standard commands may not work. This has become less of a problem in the last few years, as the GNU utilities have pretty much displaced their proprietary counterparts even on “big-iron” UNIX. Caldera’s release of the source to many of the original UNIX utilities has accelerated the trend.
Bash has certain features that the traditional Bourne shell lacks. Among these are:
- Certain extended invocation options
- Command substitution using $( ) notation
- Brace expansion
- Certain array operations, and associative arrays
- The double brackets extended test construct
- The double-parentheses arithmetic-evaluation construct
- Certain string manipulation operations
- Process substitution
- A Regular Expression matching operator
- Bash-specific builtins
- Coprocesses
See the Bash F.A.Q. for a complete listing.
36.9.1. A Test Suite
Let us illustrate some of the incompatibilities between Bash and the
- classic Bourne shell. Download and install the ` “Heirloom Bourne Shell”
- <http://freshmeat.net/projects/bournesh>`__ and run the following
script, first using Bash, then the classic sh .
Exemple 23. Test Suite¶
#!/bin/bash
# test-suite.sh
# A partial Bash compatibility test suite.
# Run this on your version of Bash, or some other shell.
default_option=FAIL # Tests below will fail unless . . .
echo
echo -n "Testing "
sleep 1; echo -n ". "
sleep 1; echo -n ". "
sleep 1; echo ". "
echo
# Double brackets
String="Double brackets supported?"
echo -n "Double brackets test: "
if [[ "$String" = "Double brackets supported?" ]]
then
echo "PASS"
else
echo "FAIL"
fi
# Double brackets and regex matching
String="Regex matching supported?"
echo -n "Regex matching: "
if [[ "$String" =~ R.....matching* ]]
then
echo "PASS"
else
echo "FAIL"
fi
# Arrays
test_arr=$default_option # FAIL
Array=( If supports arrays will print PASS )
test_arr=${Array[5]}
echo "Array test: $test_arr"
# Command Substitution
csub_test ()
{
echo "PASS"
}
test_csub=$default_option # FAIL
test_csub=$(csub_test)
echo "Command substitution test: $test_csub"
echo
# Completing this script is an exercise for the reader.
# Add to the above similar tests for double parentheses,
#+ brace expansion, process substitution, etc.
exit $?